Our analyst training program splits the skill “Speak" like an Analysis (SLA) into two themes: Collaboration and
Presentation
1) Verbally collaborating with other analysts to produce products
2) Presenting finished products to customers
This specific post focuses on Collaboration:
Managers love the word "Collaboration." It is considered vitally important by much of the workforce, yet is hard to define. Therefore, saying one will increase collaboration is a safe promise any manager or analyst can make with little accountability. For example, if a manager were to promise they would expand their production capacity by 50% with additional funding, they are on the hook to meet that goal. If the manager were to promise they would increase collaboration by 50%, how does one argue they didn’t?
Good analysts can spot political spin a mile away. Good analysts that become important managers tend to be masters of the trade.
The truth of the matter is, good
collaboration IS vitally important. Collaboration can improve idea creation while increasing scrutiny leading to better products. As you may notice, many of the example lessons I have laid out in the last few posts are heavily collaborative.
However, promoters of collaboration often ignore the truth; bad collaboration between incompatible personalities can cause highly toxic and ineffective work environments. Many an
analyst knows the difficulty in getting a good collaborative product out on time
as well as how in many instances career objectives, turf wars, personality
clashes, and annoying prima donnas can negatively affect quality of work. It
doesn’t help that analysts have a tendency to be fiercely independent, and
distrustful of an establishment that forces conformity.
Tunnel vision and stove piping issues are not only a problem found at a macro-level between organizations, but also in small teams of experts. Rather than challenging each other to improve analysis, teams of analysts sometimes split the work evenly based solely on each individual’s expertise. The end result is a product that is essentially a compilation of five different briefs from five different authors – defeating the point of working as a team.
Tunnel vision and stove piping issues are not only a problem found at a macro-level between organizations, but also in small teams of experts. Rather than challenging each other to improve analysis, teams of analysts sometimes split the work evenly based solely on each individual’s expertise. The end result is a product that is essentially a compilation of five different briefs from five different authors – defeating the point of working as a team.
Nevertheless, teams with
complimenting skills, related interests, with a foundation built on trust can (and have) produce spectacular results. These outcomes, as well as
a certain amount of idealism, are what have continued to push interest in
collaboration.
Wow, that was some tangent lol.
Anyways, we tried a number of techniques to promote positive
collaboration among students. We discovered that the best method was building
competing small teams with responsible team leads. Small teams promote the
personal connections and prevent whitewash caused by requiring too much
consensus. Designating a team leader with veto authority is important so
someone is ultimately responsible for making sure a product is completed.
We have found that competition is essential. It keeps students
motivated, even on topics that they don’t find particularly interesting.
Perhaps more importantly, it provides a benchmark in which other teams can
judge themselves against. Particularly early on, competition helps weed out
which students are serious about learning/improving and which are looking for a
paycheck.
Just as critical is to make sure that the
competition remains friendly. We had a situation where animosity formed between
two groups. If this becomes an issue, mix up the teams. Ultimately however,
a positive atmosphere and environment set by managers is the most
effective means of preventing hostile situations.
A toxic work environment is a failure of management.
Example Lesson
An early silly lesson we use to promote a collaboration based SLA is having students work together to design the most ‘innovative baby crib.’ They must use the following objects:
- Ford Model T Car
- Tissue Paper
- Dirty Laundry
- Cheez-its
- Piano Keyboard
- Trebuchet
The one below is my current favorite
and has a prominent position on the wall:
There used to be another page that
describes this baby crib’s capabilities in detail, but I think it got thrown
away in the"Great Throw Away Everything in the Office Cleanup" of
2014.
In addition to promoting collaboration and SLA, this lesson also makes a great ice breaker exercise. It also promotes "Think" Like an Analyst.

No comments:
Post a Comment